Enterprise AI QE Architecture / VeriCore
Establish the testing architecture for LLM, RAG, and agentic systems across development and production.
03 · ASSURE
Captivolt helps enterprises validate AI behaviour, govern risk, secure agentic systems, and create the evidence required for responsible deployment.
The problem
AI is entering production faster than the quality, governance, and security disciplines needed to oversee it — and regulators, boards, and auditors are starting to ask for evidence.
What we do
Captivolt helps enterprises validate AI behaviour, govern risk, secure agentic systems, and create the evidence required for responsible deployment.
Capabilities
Establish the testing architecture for LLM, RAG, and agentic systems across development and production.
Validate correctness, groundedness, consistency, relevance, safety, and policy alignment.
Test retrieval precision, source grounding, access control, hallucination risk, and response reliability.
Evaluate task completion, tool selection, tool input quality, instruction adherence, and workflow reliability.
Detect failures when prompts, models, context, tools, or retrieval sources change.
Test for jailbreaks, prompt injection, unsafe outputs, data leakage, and adversarial behaviour.
Build AI inventory, risk classification, policy controls, approval workflows, and evidence models.
Create a living register of AI systems, owners, models, data sources, integrations, and risk levels.
Assess privacy, fairness, safety, explainability, business impact, and operational risk.
Define policies, review boards, evidence requirements, decision rights, and accountability structures.
Govern retrieval sources, access permissions, lineage, grounding quality, and leakage risk.
Prepare AI management-system controls, records, policies, and operating evidence.
Map AI systems and data practices to relevant regulatory expectations.
Protect agents and LLM applications from prompt injection, jailbreaks, tool abuse, and unsafe actions.
Reduce unauthorised exposure through permission-aware retrieval, redaction, filtering, and testing.
Align data classification, access policies, and model usage controls.
Define playbooks, escalation paths, and recovery processes for AI-related incidents.
Assess code, APIs, architecture, and cloud environments for exploitable risk.
Identify design-level risks before systems are built or released.
Build security governance, risk treatment, Statement of Applicability, Annex A controls, and audit evidence.
Assess vendors, platforms, and technology dependencies for security and compliance risk.
Provide senior security leadership for risk, control maturity, board reporting, and audit readiness.
Prepare control evidence and operating cadence for SOC 2 readiness.
Reduce duplicated compliance work by mapping controls across ISO, SOC 2, DPDP, GDPR, and sector expectations.
Monitor quality, behaviour, drift, safety, cost, and performance after deployment.
Track operational cost, latency, token usage, and reliability against agreed thresholds.
Route production findings back into evaluation suites, prompts, and retrieval improvements.
Use cases
Typically a governance or AI-QE gap assessment, followed by framework implementation and an ongoing assurance cadence.
Evaluation scorecard
Every dimension below becomes a measured baseline, not an opinion.
Related work
Captivolt developed an enterprise AI framework covering use-case intake, governance, risk classification, accountability, evidence, and leadership oversight.
A structured architecture for testing and monitoring LLM, RAG, and agentic systems through evaluation datasets, prompt regression, retrieval testing, hallucination checks, and drift monitoring.
Related insights
A structured first conversation about what you are trying to build, govern, or scale.